← Back

Title of the article: «Historians’ Dispute» in Germany: the problem of responsibility for the Nazi crimes
Author(s): Rulinsky V. V.
Section: Issues of Culturology and History
Year: 2013
Issue: № 1 (XXVII)
Pages: 46-56
Index UDK:
Index BBK:
Abstract: The article deals with «Historians’ Dispute», one of the most important discussions in Germany after the Second World War. This dispute was about estimating the Nazi regime, finding out grounds and consequences of the Nazism and unleashing the Second World War. The author devotes special attention to an issue of the Nazi descendants’ responsibility for the crimes committed by their ancestors.
Keywords: Historians’ Dispute, the question of guilt, German history, Ju. Habermas, E. Nolte, Nazism
Bibliography: 1 Brodkorb M. Singuläres Auschwitz? Adebor Verlag, 2011. S. 105. 2 Ein Scherbenhaufen. Leitartikel // Frankfurter Allgemeine Zeitung. 1985. 29 April. 3 Eley G. The Past and Present Society. Nazism, Politics and the Image of the Past: Thoughts on the West German Histo¬rikerstreit 1986–1987 // Past and Present, 1988, no 121, p. 173. 4 Habermas J. The New Conservatism. Cultural Criticism and the Historian’s Debate. Cambridge, Polity Press, 1989. P. 224. 5 Kronenberg V. Der «Historikerstreit» — 20 Jahre danach // Zeitgeschichte, Wissenschaft und Politik. Wiesbaden, Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften, 2008, p. 113. 6 Kühnl R. Vergangenheit, die nicht vergeht. Die Historiker-Debatte Dokumentation, Darstellung und Kritik. Köln, Pahl-Rugenstein Verlag, 1987. S. 270. 7 Torpey J. Introduction: Habermas and the Historians // New German Critique, 1988, no 44, p. 9. 8 Boroznjak A. I. Iskuplenie. Nuzhen li Rossii germanskij opyt preodolenija totalitar-nogo proshlogo? [Redemption. Does Russia need the German experience of overcoming the totalitarian past?] Moscow, Pik Publ., 1999. 285 p. 9 Sherrer Ju. Otnoshenie k istorii v Germanii i Francii: prorabotka proshlogo, istori-cheskaja politika, politika pamjati [The attitude to history in Germany and France: study of the past, historical politics, the politics of memory]. Pro et Contra [Pro et Contra], 2009, no 3–4 (46), maj–avgust, pp. 89–109. Available at: http://carnegieendowment.org/files/ProEtContra_3.2009_all_screen.pdf (Accessed 15 February 2011).
PDF file:   Download